Sergey Blokhin on women's inaccessibility

Russia is not Europeand here a woman who treats sex just as easily as a man is considered, to say the least, frivolous. Should a girl simply express her opinion, for example, about the asexuality of the culture surrounding her, there will definitely be a cretin who would call her unsatisfied. And although time even with us has abolished many outdated intersexual misunderstandings, one still flourishes: men love accessible women, but fall in love with princesses. Magazines are written in every issue, on which it is time to unbutton your jeans: on the third or fourth one. And there are girls who, even after the fifth glass in the club, continue to play "I am not like that."

Why are they doing that? Let's start with the most obvious explanation: the girl simply does not want to have sex with this particular person. “Morality is just a posture that we take before those we do not love,” said Oscar Wilde, and there are already all the complaints about a dull man who is used to living in a simple rape culture, where any refusal is treated as latent consent. All that can be advised here is to say “no” clearly enough so that the confident asshole will understand you correctly. In theory, it should be enough to pose, but no one guarantees this, because many girls have blurred all such notions with their behavior long ago.

But suppose the girl is interested. In this case, its "inaccessibility" can be of two types: sincere and manipulative. Sincere refers to the field of morality, the ideas about which many have formed in childhood during the reading of literature of the XIX century. Suppose a girl, for some reason only known to her, really thinks that sex before cinema, dancing, walking, intimate conversations, dinners and serious relationships, whatever that means, is bad. Men are used to thinking that no "serious relationship" is possible until people physically recognize each other, because who needs a serious relationship with a log?

However, recently this thesis was refuted (thank God, not the second part of it, but only the first one). We corresponded for three weeks before it came to contact. It was intriguing, but the soul was devoured by fear: what if sex turns out to be terrible? Suppose I was lucky, but this can not be the rule. But if this is taken on faith the thesis "sex is an important part of love." There are girls who believe that a man should be suitable for them primarily on the parameters of success, salary and ability to provide comfort in the kitchen with children. Then there is really no hurry. The main thing is for a man to share her conservative outlook, and if he does, it means that he is impotent, gay, or he needs something from her very much. And this “something” is clearly not sex.

There are two types of imperfections: sincere and manipulative.

The most disgusting thing a woman can do to a man is to purposefully manipulate him, postponing sex. If the man is not an idiot, he reads this kindergarten in the very first minutes of the first date and runs away. There are no men in the world who would like to be in a similar position. Not to give on the first date so that the second takes place, and on the second - so that there is a third ... This also happens, the only question is how long it can go on. With all the sympathy for the object, I personally jump in the first stage. The hint at possible prospects hanging in the air (but not now) makes one assume that it is unlikely that something so interesting awaits me to forget about all the other possibilities. Simply put, as a man, I am sure that if a woman loves sex, she will hardly be able to avoid him as much as possible. And if you do not love, then do not.

Illustrations: Masha Shishova